[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111116143632.914b0f0cc828d90d6ec371f6@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:36:32 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Subject: kvmtool (Was: Re: Linux 3.2-rc2)
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:44:07 -0200 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> And for being an -rc2 release of a pretty large merge-window, it seems
> to be quite reasonably sized. In fact, despite this having been the
> largest linux-next in a release in our linux-next history (I think),
That is true (see http://neuling.org/linux-next-size.html). However,
linux-next "bottomed out" with >1500 (non-merge) commits still in it. Of
those, 900 are from the kvmtool tree, So, has there been any decision
about whether kvmtool will ever be included in the upstream tree?
I do not want to reinflame the discussion and am happy to carry it along
(it doesn't really interact with the rest of the tree), but if it is
never going to be merged, then I may as well drop it.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists