[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADDb1s21Px4vP5S48O770vCT6FNAw4CDR9uDRcBn=rPqfKnzQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:15:25 +0530
From: Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@...il.com>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: remove unneeded variable.
Any feedback for this patch? We surely don't need 'ret2' variable in this code.
Thanks & Regards,
Amit Sahrawat
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com> wrote:
> ret2 is not needed in ext4_flush_completed_IO().
>
> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Sahrawat <amit.sahrawat83@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/ext4/fsync.c | 5 +----
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/fsync.c b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
> index 00a2cb7..40397ac 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/fsync.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
> @@ -81,7 +81,6 @@ int ext4_flush_completed_IO(struct inode *inode)
> struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(inode);
> unsigned long flags;
> int ret = 0;
> - int ret2 = 0;
>
> dump_completed_IO(inode);
> spin_lock_irqsave(&ei->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
> @@ -105,12 +104,10 @@ int ext4_flush_completed_IO(struct inode *inode)
> */
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ei->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
> ret = ext4_end_io_nolock(io);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - ret2 = ret;
> spin_lock_irqsave(&ei->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
> }
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ei->i_completed_io_lock, flags);
> - return (ret2 < 0) ? ret2 : 0;
> + return (ret < 0) ? ret : 0;
> }
>
> /*
> --
> 1.7.4.4
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists