[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111117190407.GB20552@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 20:04:07 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] pids: Make it possible to clone tasks with given
pids
On 11/17, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Ok. Patches 1-2 look sane on their own. I think we can merge them
> regardless in the next cycle if Oleg & co agree. Oleg?
I am not sure 1/3 really makes sense without 3/3... although it
cleanups the "goto out" logic in alloc_pid().
Anyway I agree, the patches look fine.
> Patch 3 obviously is generating discussion and actually introduces new
> functionality, so this one is the contentious one..
>
> Linus
>
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com> wrote:
> >
> > When restoring a task (or a set of tasks) we need to recreate them
> > with exactly the same pid(s) as they had before. [...]
Yes.
Just in case, I believe technically 3/3 is correct too, modulo the
small problem with the unchecked access to ->pidmap[] (unless I missed
something again).
I am not sure about pid_max... probably we do not care in this case?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists