[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111117190920.GD2873@amit-x200.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:39:20 +0530
From: Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Miche Baker-Harvey <miche@...gle.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>,
Mike Waychison <mikew@...gle.com>,
ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Eric Northrup <digitaleric@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] virtio_console: Fix locking of vtermno.
On (Fri) 11 Nov 2011 [14:57:20], Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 13:44:58 -0800, Miche Baker-Harvey <miche@...gle.com> wrote:
> > Some modifications of vtermno were not done under the spinlock.
> >
> > Moved assignment from vtermno and increment of vtermno together,
> > putting both under the spinlock. Revert vtermno on failure.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Miche Baker-Harvey <miche@...gle.com>
>
> Does it matter? It's normal not to lock in a function called
> "init_XXX", since it's not exposed yet.
>
> Or is it?
Slight misnomer, I suppose.
We do this init_console_port() as part of add_port() if the port is a
console port. Should it be named 'mark_console_port()'? Dunno,
doesn't sound like the right name. init fits closest.
Amit
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists