lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1321650239.2653.68.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
Date:	Fri, 18 Nov 2011 23:03:59 +0200
From:	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
To:	Jim Rees <rees@...ch.edu>
Cc:	John Hughes <john@...vaedi.com>, John Hughes <john@...va.com>,
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add "-e" option to rpc.gssd to allow error on ticket
 expiry. Try 2 with added man pages.

On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 15:57 -0500, Jim Rees wrote: 
> Trond Myklebust wrote:
> 
>   On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 20:19 +0100, John Hughes wrote: 
>   > On 11/18/2011 07:35 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>   > > On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 15:34 +0100, John Hughes wrote:
>   > >    
>   > >> Description: Add "-e" (ticket expiry is error) option to rpc.gssd
>   > >>    In kernels starting around 2.6.34 the nfs4 server will block all I/O
>   > >>    when a user ticket expires.  In earlier kernels the I/O would fail
>   > >>    with an EACCESS error.  This patch adds a "-e" option to rpc.gssd
>   > >>    which allow the earlier behaviour (EKEYEXPIRED is converted to
>   > >>    EACCESS).  This behaviour is particularly useful when user home
>   > >>    directories are nfs4 mounted with krb5 security - if the user is
>   > >>    absent from their workstation for long enough for the ticket to
>   > >>    expire a new ticket will be obtained (via pam_krb5) by the screen
>   > >>    unlock process.
>   > >>      
>   > > You need a big fat warning somewhere that enabling this option WILL
>   > > cause data corruption...
>   > >    
>   > Why?
>   > 
>   > Because some process may get the EACCES error half way through it's 
>   > operation.
>   
>   No. Because the process can receive a reply to the write() syscall that
>   indicates that the data is safe, but the EKEYEXPIRED error will cause
>   the data to be lost when the client tries to actually commit the data to
>   disk.
> 
> The write() syscall doesn't indicate whether the data is safe or not.  That
> would be the close() syscall.

fsync(). Which may succeed if the user renews their ticket first.
However you may still have data loss if dirty data has been lost because
of EKEYEXPIRED returns on the WRITE RPC call...

Also, for the fsync() to return EKEYEXPIRED _after_ the user has renewed
their ticket would seem counter-intuitive to most people.

-- 
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

NetApp
Trond.Myklebust@...app.com
www.netapp.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ