[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF1740D74FE6@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:44:48 -0800
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
To: Denis Kuzmenko <linux@...onet.org.ua>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] s3c/s3c24xx: arm: leds: Make s3c24xx LEDS driver use
gpiolib
Denis Kuzmenko wrote at Friday, November 18, 2011 3:35 PM:
> On 11/18/2011 11:59 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > Denis Kuzmenko wrote at Friday, November 18, 2011 2:45 PM:
> >> Make s3c24xx LEDS driver use gpiolib. Disable using pull-resistor when not
> >> using S3C24XX_LEDF_TRISTATE and enble it when in opposite case.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Denis Kuzmenko <linux@...onet.org.ua>
> >
> >> if (pdata->flags & S3C24XX_LEDF_TRISTATE) {
> >> - s3c2410_gpio_setpin(pdata->gpio, 0);
> >> - s3c2410_gpio_cfgpin(pdata->gpio, S3C2410_GPIO_INPUT);
> >> + /*
> >> + * pull is needed here to protect pin from being left
> >> + * floating
> >> + */
> >> + ret = s3c_gpio_setpull(pdata->gpio, S3C_GPIO_PULL_UP);
> >> + if (ret)
> >> + s3c_gpio_setpull(pdata->gpio, S3C_GPIO_PULL_DOWN);
> >
> > Sorry, could you explain why it's appropriate to configure a pull here
> > at all, let alone why it's OK to have a random pull on the line?
> >
>
> Of course I'll explain.
> Imagine you are working with generic GPIO lines on your board connecting
> and disconnecting LEDs and other stuff. In this case there can be
> situation where GPIO line is configured as TRISTATE LED but have nothing
> connected physically to pin. This configuration is dangerous because
> input pin without _any_ pull-resistor is _much_ more sensitive to
> statical electricity (ESD) so you can *burn* (unsure this is correct
> word) your pin much easily (especially is you are using soldering iron
> as much as I do). Most of GPIO modules I worked with have "input with
> pull-up" as default and most safe initial state (and s3c2440's one is
> not an exception).
> Maybe, I need to write more wide exlanation in comment above?
OK, I see the need for a pull of some kind (although aren't there meant
to be ESD protection diodes for this purpose; relying on what are probably
pretty weak pullup/down resistors doesn't seem like it will provide much
protection at all).
I have a slight feeling this detail should be hidden inside the gpiolib
driver.
Presumably the pull is pretty weak, so that if/when the pin is actively
driven later, the drive completely overrides this pull?
Is this pull strong enough to light the LED? Judging by what
s3c24xx_led_set() does, when the LED is off, the pin is tri-stated, and
when the LED is on, it's driven (high/low depending on the active high/low
flag). When tri-stated, if the pull happens to pull the same direction as
the on state would drive it, won't the LED light? It seems like you need
to pick a suitable pull direction based on flags & S3C24XX_LEDF_ACTLOW,
and if that can't be set, it's an error.
(BTW, when posting a new version, starting a new thread with just the
patch, rather than pasting it into a reply and prefixing it with other
text will make is easiest for people to take the patch and apply it)
--
nvpublic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists