[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EC6E75E.2080200@solonet.org.ua>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 01:16:46 +0200
From: Denis Kuzmenko <linux@...onet.org.ua>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s3c/s3c24xx: arm: leds: Make s3c24xx LEDS driver use
gpiolib
On 11/19/2011 12:44 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Denis Kuzmenko wrote at Friday, November 18, 2011 3:35 PM:
>> On 11/18/2011 11:59 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>> Denis Kuzmenko wrote at Friday, November 18, 2011 2:45 PM:
>>>> Make s3c24xx LEDS driver use gpiolib. Disable using pull-resistor when not
>>>> using S3C24XX_LEDF_TRISTATE and enble it when in opposite case.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Denis Kuzmenko <linux@...onet.org.ua>
>>>
>>>> if (pdata->flags & S3C24XX_LEDF_TRISTATE) {
>>>> - s3c2410_gpio_setpin(pdata->gpio, 0);
>>>> - s3c2410_gpio_cfgpin(pdata->gpio, S3C2410_GPIO_INPUT);
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * pull is needed here to protect pin from being left
>>>> + * floating
>>>> + */
>>>> + ret = s3c_gpio_setpull(pdata->gpio, S3C_GPIO_PULL_UP);
>>>> + if (ret)
>>>> + s3c_gpio_setpull(pdata->gpio, S3C_GPIO_PULL_DOWN);
>>>
>>> Sorry, could you explain why it's appropriate to configure a pull here
>>> at all, let alone why it's OK to have a random pull on the line?
>>>
>>
>> Of course I'll explain.
>> Imagine you are working with generic GPIO lines on your board connecting
>> and disconnecting LEDs and other stuff. In this case there can be
>> situation where GPIO line is configured as TRISTATE LED but have nothing
>> connected physically to pin. This configuration is dangerous because
>> input pin without _any_ pull-resistor is _much_ more sensitive to
>> statical electricity (ESD) so you can *burn* (unsure this is correct
>> word) your pin much easily (especially is you are using soldering iron
>> as much as I do). Most of GPIO modules I worked with have "input with
>> pull-up" as default and most safe initial state (and s3c2440's one is
>> not an exception).
>> Maybe, I need to write more wide exlanation in comment above?
>
> OK, I see the need for a pull of some kind (although aren't there meant
> to be ESD protection diodes for this purpose; relying on what are probably
> pretty weak pullup/down resistors doesn't seem like it will provide much
> protection at all).
>
I don't mean pull as any kind of good protection. But it's much better
to have it than not.
> I have a slight feeling this detail should be hidden inside the gpiolib
> driver.
>
Do you mean to add to a function that makes pin act as input some kind
of logic like:
if(!(flags & FLAG_PULL_NONE))
try_to_enable_pull(PULL_ANY);
?
> Presumably the pull is pretty weak, so that if/when the pin is actively
> driven later, the drive completely overrides this pull?
>
As far as know pull-resistor is _designed_ to be weak enough so driver
can always override it.
> Is this pull strong enough to light the LED? Judging by what
> s3c24xx_led_set() does, when the LED is off, the pin is tri-stated, and
> when the LED is on, it's driven (high/low depending on the active high/low
> flag). When tri-stated, if the pull happens to pull the same direction as
> the on state would drive it, won't the LED light? It seems like you need
> to pick a suitable pull direction based on flags & S3C24XX_LEDF_ACTLOW,
> and if that can't be set, it's an error.
I couldn't find any information about pull strength in s3c2440's
datasheet but usually pull is about 10-100k. So even in worst case
maximum current through it on 3.3V VCC is 0.33 mA (not taking into
account own LED's resistance and voltage-fall) which is definitely not
enough to light a LED.
> (BTW, when posting a new version, starting a new thread with just the
> patch, rather than pasting it into a reply and prefixing it with other
> text will make is easiest for people to take the patch and apply it)
Thank you, I'll do so in future.
--
Best regards, Denis Kuzmenko.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists