linux-kernel - [PATCH] genirq: fix second 2.6.39 regression in irqfixup, irqpoll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1321754063-2887-1-git-send-email-edward.donovan@numble.net>
Date:	Sat, 19 Nov 2011 20:54:22 -0500
From:	Edward Donovan <edward.donovan@...ble.net>
To:	tglx@...utronix.de
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, maciej.rutecki@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH] genirq: fix second 2.6.39 regression in irqfixup, irqpoll

Hi Thomas -

I did isolate another regression in the bad-irq handling, and this
patch sets things right on my machines.  After bisecting it, I've just
been troubleshooting to find which code was making the difference.
This is my attempt to restore it, in a reasonable place.

I don't know if this is the way you'd like to do it in the reworked
IRQ code, since I'm not very familiar with the system yet.  This is
the most C I've dealt with, and partly I'm just moving puzzle pieces
around.  I have tested it a good bit, though, and functionally it has
been fine.

So, let me know if you have a preferred patch, and I'll test it on
these machines.  Thanks!

Edward

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/