[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ECA83B3.6040000@bfs.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:00:35 +0100
From: walter harms <wharms@....de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mpi/mpi-mpow: NULL dereference on allocation failure
Am 21.11.2011 15:50, schrieb Dan Carpenter:
> We can't call mpi_free() on the elements if the first kzalloc() fails.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>
> diff --git a/lib/mpi/mpi-mpow.c b/lib/mpi/mpi-mpow.c
> index 4cc7593..7328d0d 100644
> --- a/lib/mpi/mpi-mpow.c
> +++ b/lib/mpi/mpi-mpow.c
> @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ int mpi_mulpowm(MPI res, MPI *basearray, MPI *exparray, MPI m)
>
> G = kzalloc((1 << k) * sizeof *G, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!G)
> - goto nomem;
> + goto err_out;
>
> /* and calculate */
> tmp = mpi_alloc(mpi_get_nlimbs(m) + 1);
> @@ -129,5 +129,6 @@ nomem:
> for (i = 0; i < (1 << k); i++)
> mpi_free(G[i]);
> kfree(G);
> +err_out:
> return rc;
> }
the patch is ok
but is there any reason *not* to use a more nice name that 'G'
something more descriptive perhaps ?
re,
wh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists