linux-kernel - Re: WARNING: at mm/slub.c:3357, kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3413

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1321999085.14573.2.camel@pasglop>
Date:	Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:58:05 +1100
From:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Christian Kujau <lists@...dbynature.de>,
	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
	"Alex,Shi" <alex.shi@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: WARNING: at mm/slub.c:3357, kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:3413

On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 08:48 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le lundi 21 novembre 2011 à 21:18 -0600, Christoph Lameter a écrit :
> 
> > Hmmm... That means that c->page points to page not frozen. Per cpu
> > partial pages are frozen until they are reused or until the partial list
> > is flushed.
> > 
> > Does this ever happen on x86 or only on other platforms? In put_cpu_partial() the
> > this_cpu_cmpxchg really needs really to be irq safe. this_cpu_cmpxchg is
> > only preempt safe.
> > 
> > Index: linux-2.6/mm/slub.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slub.c	2011-11-21 21:15:41.575673204 -0600
> > +++ linux-2.6/mm/slub.c	2011-11-21 21:16:33.442336849 -0600
> > @@ -1969,7 +1969,7 @@
> >  		page->pobjects = pobjects;
> >  		page->next = oldpage;
> > 
> > -	} while (this_cpu_cmpxchg(s->cpu_slab->partial, oldpage, page) != oldpage);
> > +	} while (irqsafe_cpu_cmpxchg(s->cpu_slab->partial, oldpage, page) != oldpage);
> >  	stat(s, CPU_PARTIAL_FREE);
> >  	return pobjects;
> >  }
> > 
> 
> For x86, I wonder if our !X86_FEATURE_CX16 support is correct on SMP
> machines.
> 
> this_cpu_cmpxchg16b_emu() claims to be IRQ safe, but may be buggy...
> 
> Could we have somewhere a NMI handler calling kmalloc() ?

Christian and I are on ppc, which uses the generic implementation of
this_cpu_cmpxchg() which is not irq safe. So the above patch is needed
regardless.

Christian, can you try it see if that helps in your case ?

Cheers,
Ben.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/