[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2657.1322046680@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:11:20 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, DM <dm.n9107@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kernel.h: Add BUILD_BUG() macro.
David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com> wrote:
> From: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
>
> We can place this in definitions that we expect the compiler to remove
> by dead code elimination. If this assertion fails, we get a nice
> error message at build time.
>
> The GCC function attribute error("message") was added in version 4.3,
> so we define a new macro __linktime_error(message) to expand to this
> for GCC-4.3 and later. This will give us an error diagnostic from the
> compiler on the line that fails. For other compilers
> __linktime_error(message) expands to nothing, and we have to be
> content with a link time error, but at least we will still get a build
> error.
>
> BUILD_BUG() expands to the undefined function __build_bug_failed() and
> will fail at link time if the compiler ever emits code for it. On
> GCC-4.3 and later, attribute((error())) is used so that the failure
> will be noted at compile time instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists