[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1322061561.20742.53.camel@frodo>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:19:21 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] trace_event_filter: factorize filter creation
On Tue, 2011-11-22 at 18:00 -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> There are four places where new filter for a given filter string is
> created, which involves several different steps. This patch factors
> those steps into create_[system_]filter() functions which in turn make
> use of create_filter_{start|finish}() for common parts.
>
> The only functional change is that if replace_filter_string() is
> requested and fails, creation fails without any side effect instead of
> being ignored.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> ---
> These two are on top of the current linus/master bbbc4791cd "Merge
> branch 'staging-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/.../gregkh/staging" as
> tip seems to be lagging behind for the moment.
>
> Thank you.
>
> kernel/trace/trace_events_filter.c | 274 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 137 insertions(+), 137 deletions(-)
For such a change, I would have liked to see more deletions than
insertions. Although, if it removes duplicate code, I'm not against such
a change. I'll look at this more when I get some more time. But just in
case I forget about it (because I wont look at it before my turkey
dinner tomorrow, and will most likely forget about it come next Monday),
please feel free to ping me again next week.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists