[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1111231127370.2111-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:28:03 -0500 (EST)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
cc: Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5] PM: Update comments describing device power management
callbacks
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 22, 2011, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Nov 2011, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > > The same data structure (dev_pm_ops) is used for both drivers and
> > > > subsystems. Therefore the comments should be directed toward both
> > > > driver writers and subsystem writers.
> > >
> > > I don't quite agree. Trying to do so would turn that comment into a lengthy
> > > document and there's no room for anything like that in the header file.
> >
> > That's a good point.
> >
> > > Perhaps I'll just modify the comment to say when the callbacks are executed
> > > without specifying what the specific callbacks are supposed to do (because
> > > that may vary from one subsystem to another and even between different
> > > drivers belonging to the same subsystem). If PM domains are taken into
> > > account, it gets even more complicated.
> >
> > Yes, a minimal description would be good, along with a pointer to the
> > Documentation/power files.
>
> Well, the one below is not exactly minimal, but I think it doesn't go too
> far at least.
Yes, I like this version better.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists