[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF174F08C6DC@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:13:56 -0800
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
To: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: bug of gpio transition in pinmux driver
Haojian Zhuang wrote at Wednesday, November 23, 2011 6:13 AM:
> Hi Linus & Stephen,
>
> There's a bug in pinmux driver. We can request gpio via
> pinmux_request_gpio(@gpio). @gpio is the gpio number.
>
> In pinmux_request_gpio():
> pin = @gpio - range->base;
> pin_request(pin);
>
> This pin is the index of pinctrl_pin_desc[]. What's the definition of
> pinctrl_pin_desc's index? It's the index of PAD, not GPIO. Since the
> goal of pinmux_request_gpio() is to avoid define too much gpio groups.
> We need to add the transition between gpio and pad. It's clear that
> the transition of "pin = @gpio - range->base" can't fit every silicon.
> Especially, one gpio can be routed to two pads in PXA silicon.
That particular case isn't really covered yet; we've been discussing how
to solve that case; see:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/21/370
--
nvpublic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists