[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <74CDBE0F657A3D45AFBB94109FB122FF174F08C6F0@HQMAIL01.nvidia.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:25:36 -0800
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
To: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@...dia.com>
CC: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Marc Dietrich <marvin24@....de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] arm/tegra: convert tegra20 to GIC devicetree binding
Peter De Schrijver wrote at Tuesday, November 22, 2011 10:00 PM:
...
> I think we need to model the GPIO IRQs as a seperate interrupt controller.
> That way the WM8903 node can refer to the GPIO IRQ as an IRQ without
> hardcoding the global interrupt number, similar to the way we specify the
> SPI number in the device nodes and not the global interrupt number.
Yes, you're right.
I'd originally thought that the GPIO IRQs fed directly into the GIC, but
now that I read the docs, I see that the GPIO controller really is an
interrupt aggregator/controller.
--
nvpublic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists