linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/7] Introducing a generic AMP framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK=Wgba49eu_MGTWP_SND1=KDPp=MfuDyvxFGA_NND=ydqBmZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:43:03 +0200
From:	Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
To:	Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Introducing a generic AMP framework

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Saravana Kannan
<skannan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> remoteproc would probably be the best fit since it's already used in the
> code and people are used to discussing about it.

Guys you realize that 'amp' isn't really being used in the code
itself; this discussion boils down to the text we have in the patches'
subject line and the top level Kconfig/folder entry :)

But, sure, I'll just drop those 'amp' text instances, and we'll have
'remoteproc' and 'rpmsg' as separate top-level frameworks again.

Thanks,
Ohad.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/