[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EDE9289.8040903@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:09:13 -0800
From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Introducing a generic AMP framework
On 11/24/2011 12:43 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Saravana Kannan
> <skannan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> remoteproc would probably be the best fit since it's already used in the
>> code and people are used to discussing about it.
>
> Guys you realize that 'amp' isn't really being used in the code
> itself; this discussion boils down to the text we have in the patches'
> subject line and the top level Kconfig/folder entry :)
>
> But, sure, I'll just drop those 'amp' text instances, and we'll have
> 'remoteproc' and 'rpmsg' as separate top-level frameworks again.
>
> Thanks,
> Ohad.
Yes, I did realize it's not used in the code. I just wanted to prevent
what I considered a misuse of "AMP". Thanks for accommodating my request.
-Saravana
--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists