[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1322130279.2921.7.camel@twins>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 11:24:39 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Venki Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.jf.intel.com>, alex.shi@...el.com
Subject: Re: [patch 1/6] sched, nohz: introduce nohz_flags in the struct rq
On Fri, 2011-11-18 at 15:03 -0800, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> plain text document attachment (introduce_rq_nohz_flags.patch)
> Introduce nohz_flags in the struct rq, which will track two flags for now.
>
> NOHZ_TICK_STOPPED will convey the stop tick status that gets set when
> the tick is stopped and cleared during the first busy tick after the tick
> is restarted.
>
> NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK will track the need for nohz idle load balance
> on this rq.
The changelog is missing the crucial part: Why are we doing this? :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists