[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20469.1322130295@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:24:55 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"ralf@...ux-mips.org" <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, DM <dm.n9107@...il.com>,
David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>,
"Pinski, Andrew" <Andrew.Pinski@...iumnetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Stop some of the abuse of BUG() where compile time checks should be used.
David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com> wrote:
> We thought about doing that, but without doing some complex preprocessor fu,
> the GCC attribute ((error())) thing doesn't do what we want.
>
> It appears that if more than a single instance of the construct is used in a
> compilation unit, the string emitted by the compiler for any of the violations
> will be the last string encountered.
Have you tried asking the gcc folks if this is likely to get fixed soon?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists