[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1111231751480.9042@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:52:08 -0800 (PST)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch for-3.2-rc3] cpusets: stall when updating mems_allowed
for mempolicy or disjoint nodemask
On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Miao Xie wrote:
> Memory compaction will see an empty nodemask and do nothing, and then
> we may fail to get several contiguous pages.
>
Where do we rely on a consistent nodemask for memory compaction?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists