[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ECDB10E.1080007@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:50:54 +0800
From: Miao Xie <miaox@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Paul Menage <paul@...lmenage.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch for-3.2-rc3] cpusets: stall when updating mems_allowed
for mempolicy or disjoint nodemask
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:52:08 -0800 (pst), David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Miao Xie wrote:
>
>> Memory compaction will see an empty nodemask and do nothing, and then
>> we may fail to get several contiguous pages.
>>
>
> Where do we rely on a consistent nodemask for memory compaction?
Maybe I am overcautious.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists