[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ED3B118.50502@parallels.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 20:04:40 +0400
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Add the kernel.ns_last_pid control
On 11/28/2011 07:53 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 07:21:25PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>> +static int pid_ns_ctl_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>> + void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
>> +{
>> + struct ctl_table tmp = *table;
>> +
>> + if (write && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
>> + return -EPERM;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Writing directly to ns' last_pid field is OK, since this field
>> + * is volatile in a living namespace anyway and a code writing to
>> + * it should synchronize its usage with external means.
>> + */
>
> I would still prefer using set_last_pid() but if you insist to update
> last_pid directly, please note the direct update in the comment on top
> of set_last_pid() too.
It's already there in this patch.
> Other than that,
>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Thanks!
> Thanks.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists