[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ED5E99D.2030609@ladisch.de>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:30:21 +0100
From: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>
To: Jeroen Van den Keybus <jeroen.vandenkeybus@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Unhandled IRQs on AMD E-450
Jeroen Van den Keybus wrote:
> On an Asus E45M1-M PRO (AMD E-450) board with 64-bit Linux 3.0.0
> (Ubuntu) and 3.2.0, I regularly get (more detailed logs at the end):
>
>
> Nov 28 04:35:29 zacate kernel: [29581.259926] irq 16: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> Nov 24 21:25:41 zacate kernel: [ 190.503838] irq 19: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> What could be going wrong here ?
* Some buggy driver might not realize that an interrupt came from its
device.
* Some buggy device might raise an interrupt without telling the driver
that it needs attention.
* Some buggy device might raise a wrong interrupt. (This might include
devices that generate a PCI interrupt although they are configured for
MSI.)
* Some buggy interrupt controller might be doing 'interesting' things.
> - The problem with IRQ19 goes away (at least sufficiently long not to
> be occurring within 24h) when module e1000 is unloaded.
This looks like a bug in the e1000 hardware or software.
> I note that at least 3 devices
> (00:15.x, 05:02.0 and 00:14.2) have their IRQ lines routed to IRQ 16,
> but I see only 2 handlers in the dmesg log and /proc/interrupts.
lspci -s 0:15 -vv
Regards,
Clemens
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists