[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1322670031.2921.286.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:20:31 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Anton Arapov <anton@...hat.com>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Stephen Wilson <wilsons@...rt.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/5] uprobes: kill xol vma
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 17:15 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > static unsigned char
> > -uprobe_xol_slots[UPROBES_XOL_SLOT_BYTES][NR_CPUS] __page_aligned_bss;
> > +uprobe_xol_slots[NR_CPUS][UPROBES_XOL_SLOT_BYTES] __page_aligned_bss;
>
> NR_CPUS arrays are basically always wrong.
>
> Use per cpu data.
Doesn't really work here, you'd know if you'd read the patches. What we
could do though is do a UPROBES_XOL_SLOT_BYTES * nr_cpu_ids bootmem
allocation or so.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists