[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1322755222-6951-1-git-send-email-mhocko@suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 17:00:22 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH] nohz: Remove update_ts_time_stat from tick_nohz_start_idle
There is no reason to call update_ts_time_stat from tick_nohz_start_idle
anymore (after e0e37c20 sched: Eliminate the ts->idle_lastupdate field)
when we updated idle_lastupdate unconditionally.
We haven't set idle_active yet and do not provide last_update_time so
the whole call end up being just 2 wasted branches.
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
CC: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 2 --
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
index 4042064..be3cab0 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
@@ -186,8 +186,6 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_start_idle(int cpu, struct tick_sched *ts)
now = ktime_get();
- update_ts_time_stats(cpu, ts, now, NULL);
-
ts->idle_entrytime = now;
ts->idle_active = 1;
sched_clock_idle_sleep_event();
--
1.7.7.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists