[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111202004513.GA15880@somewhere.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 01:45:17 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nohz: Remove update_ts_time_stat from
tick_nohz_start_idle
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:00:22PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> There is no reason to call update_ts_time_stat from tick_nohz_start_idle
> anymore (after e0e37c20 sched: Eliminate the ts->idle_lastupdate field)
> when we updated idle_lastupdate unconditionally.
>
> We haven't set idle_active yet and do not provide last_update_time so
> the whole call end up being just 2 wasted branches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> CC: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists