[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111202095756.GB15975@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 15:27:56 +0530
From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nohz: Remove update_ts_time_stat from
tick_nohz_start_idle
* Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz> [2011-12-01 17:00:22]:
> There is no reason to call update_ts_time_stat from tick_nohz_start_idle
> anymore (after e0e37c20 sched: Eliminate the ts->idle_lastupdate field)
> when we updated idle_lastupdate unconditionally.
>
> We haven't set idle_active yet and do not provide last_update_time so
> the whole call end up being just 2 wasted branches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
> CC: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists