[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111202124551.GD14515@moon>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 16:45:51 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <pedro@...esourcery.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Andrew Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
Serge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@...onical.com>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>
Subject: Re: [rfc 2/3] fs, proc: Introduce the Children: line in
/proc/<pid>/status
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 04:43:10PM +0400, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
...
> >>
> >> Yes, I like /children file. other points seems to be pointed out by other
> >> reviewers.
> >
> > Any reason this is a file instead of a directory like /proc/PID/task/ ?
> >
> > $ sudo ls /proc/8167/task/
> > 8167 854 855 856 857 858 859
> > $ sudo ls /proc/8167/task/855/
> > attr clear_refs cpuset exe io loginuid mountinfo oom_adj pagemap sched smaps statm wchan
> > auxv cmdline cwd fd latency maps mounts oom_score personality schedstat stack status
> > cgroup comm environ fdinfo limits mem numa_maps oom_score_adj root sessionid stat syscall
> >
> > Much easier to follow the chain from the command line this way.
>
> What do you propose to put into these directories? Another directories named with
> children pid-s?
>
Yes, I suppose additional directory/links and whatever would be just
noneeded overhead.
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists