[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111202124558.GB1295@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 13:45:58 +0100
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jump_label: jump_label for boot options.
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 10:24:10AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 09:22 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> >
> > Yes, that's an idea. But we also have another stupid shadow swap accounting
> > table. This can be disabled at boot, too.
>
> Bah I thought it was just the page frame thing, hnaz any plans to kill
> this swap array as well?
I haven't looked at the swap accounting at all yet, sorry. But where
did this discussion go all of a sudden? :-)
That array is not allocated at all when the memory controller is
disabled at boot-time.
Rather, we have those mem_cgroup_disabled() conditionals everytime we
enter the memory controller from the VM and the idea is to patch them
out during boot, since you can not re-enable the thing anyway.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists