linux-kernel - Re: 3.2.0-rc4+ (Linus GIT af968e29acd91ebeb4224e899202c46c93171ecd) -- Freezing of tasks failed after 20.01 seconds (1 tasks refusing to freeze, wq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 03 Dec 2011 23:07:30 +0530
From:	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Miles Lane <miles.lane@...il.com>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.2.0-rc4+ (Linus GIT af968e29acd91ebeb4224e899202c46c93171ecd)
 -- Freezing of tasks failed after 20.01 seconds (1 tasks refusing to freeze,
 wq_busy=0):

On 12/03/2011 10:47 PM, Miles Lane wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 11:44 AM, Srivatsa S. Bhat
> <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> On 12/03/2011 09:07 PM, Miles Lane wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks!  The patch worked perfectly.
>>>
>>>         Miles
>>>
>>
>>
>> I had written that patch when I found a possibility of freezing failure when
>> looking at the code. I hadn't really hit the problem myself. (And to test my
>> patch's effectiveness, I had used a synthetic scenario that I had created.)
>>
>> So, since you seem to have hit the problem during normal usage itself and not
>> while doing anything fancy, out of curiosity, what triggered the problem?
> 
> I was intentionally checking for problems with reading the contents of
> the /sys and /proc trees.  So I ran:
> find /sys -name "[a-z]*" | xargs head
> and
> find /proc -name "[q-z]*" | xargs head
> and then, while the commands were processing files I suspended
> (unsuccessfully) the laptop.
> 
> I have often found bugs in this area, so I periodically run this test.
>  Sometimes it turns up problems in accessing specific information in
> the data files.  This is the first time I added trying to suspend
> while the test was running.
> 
> Happy coding!
>       Miles
> 


Great! Thanks for telling how you triggered the problem!

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/