[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EDA5E7F.30508@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2011 18:38:07 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio-scsi: first version
On 12/03/2011 12:07 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> This is typically the one thing you should -really- obtain from the
> other side. This is the number one reason why we cannot today reliably
> emulate a SCSI controller in qemu -and- pass-through the SCSI commands
> to the host /dev/sg or equivalent (only full device emulation is
> reliable).
>
> This is also typically what something like virtio-scsi allows us to fix,
> so let's fix it. IE. we have the ability to query the "limits" of the
> real HBA / transport on the host side and to pass them along to the
> guest, which enables us to do real pass-through.
You can fix this in QEMU; READ and WRITE commands can be split in
multiple parts. The scsi-block device I added recently does this.
However, it seems like a simple change, so I'll do it. I'll add
max_sectors and cmd_per_lun to the config space.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists