linux-kernel - Re: [SCSI] NULL pointer dereference in sym53c8xx (bisected)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EDABAB5.10104@gentoo.org>
Date:	Sun, 04 Dec 2011 02:11:33 +0200
From:	Stratos Psomadakis <psomas@...too.org>
To:	Steffen Maier <maier@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	gregkh@...e.de, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	JBottomley@...allels.com, matthew@....cx, Martin.vGagern@....net,
	kernel@...too.org
Subject: Re: [SCSI] NULL pointer dereference in sym53c8xx (bisected)

On 12/03/2011 11:07 PM, Steffen Maier wrote:
> On 12/02/2011 04:26 PM, Stratos Psomadakis wrote:
>> After upstream commit 4e6c82b3614a18740ef63109d58743a359266daf ([SCSI]
>> fix WARNING: at drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:1704), which is also included in
>> 3.0-stable and 3.1-stable kernels, the kernel fails to boot (NULL
>> pointer dereference in sym53c8xx_slave_destroy).
>>
>> Bug report at the Gentoo Bugzilla (reported and bisected by Martin von
>> Gagern). [1]  (stack trace [2])
>>
>> I think that the problem is that (after commit 4e6c82b)
>> __scsi_remove_device() is called if slave_alloc() in scsi_alloc_sdev()
>> fails. But __scsi_remove_device() calls slave_destroy(), which (I think)
>> doesn't make much sense (ie to call slave_destroy() when slave_alloc()
>> fails).
>>
>> For sym53c8xx, this results in a NULL pointer dereference (struct
>> sym_lcb pointer) in slave_destroy().
>>
>> [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392567
>> [2] https://392567.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=294381
>
> To me this looks like the same thing we encountered in the zfcp LLD:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg55575.html
> James explained the pairing of slave_alloc and slave_destroy even if
> slave_alloc returned early in which case slave_destroy needs to cope
> with that:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg55449.html
>
Indeed.

I'll follow-up with a patch similar to the one you sent for zfcp. I
think that returning if sym_lcb is NULL should be ok.

> HTH
> Steffen
>
> Linux on System z Development
>
> IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martin Jetter
> Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294
>
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-- 
Stratos Psomadakis
<psomas@...too.org>



Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (263 bytes)