[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EDBAFC5.2010405@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2011 19:37:09 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
markmc@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] virtio-ring: Use threshold for switching to indirect
descriptors
On 12/04/2011 07:34 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> >
> > I'm confused. didn't you see a bigger benefit for guest->host by
> > switching indirect off?
>
> The 5% improvement is over the 'regular' indirect on, not over indirect
> off. Sorry for the confusion there.
>
> I suggested this change regardless of the outcome of indirect descriptor
> threshold discussion, since it would help anyways.
For net, this makes sense. For block, it reduces the effective queue
depth, so it's not a trivial change. It probably makes sense there too,
though.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists