linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111204144442.23d65ae8@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 4 Dec 2011 14:44:42 +0000
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	VDR User <user.vdr@...il.com>
Cc:	Walter Van Eetvelt <walter@....eetvelt.be>,
	Andreas Oberritter <obi@...uxtv.org>, HoP <jpetrous@...il.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver
 because of worrying about possible misusage?

> While I agree with your more broad view of the issue, I specifically
> talked about VDR.  AFAIK Klaus has no intention of adding true
> server/client support to VDR, so for VDR users, this sounds like it
> could be a working solution without the strict limitations of
> streamdev.

So fix Klaus rather than mess up the kernel.

If you are trying to solve a VDR political problem then kernel hacks are
not the way to go. Someone who cares about it needs to fix VDR, with or
without its current maintainer.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/