lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2011 14:44:42 +0000 From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> To: VDR User <user.vdr@...il.com> Cc: Walter Van Eetvelt <walter@....eetvelt.be>, Andreas Oberritter <obi@...uxtv.org>, HoP <jpetrous@...il.com>, Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage? > While I agree with your more broad view of the issue, I specifically > talked about VDR. AFAIK Klaus has no intention of adding true > server/client support to VDR, so for VDR users, this sounds like it > could be a working solution without the strict limitations of > streamdev. So fix Klaus rather than mess up the kernel. If you are trying to solve a VDR political problem then kernel hacks are not the way to go. Someone who cares about it needs to fix VDR, with or without its current maintainer. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists