[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1323051664.22361.358.camel@sli10-conroe>
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2011 10:21:04 +0800
From: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"Shi, Alex" <alex.shi@...el.com>,
"penberg@...nel.org" <penberg@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] slub: set a criteria for slub node partial adding
On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 04:02 +0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > netperf (loopback or ethernet) is a known stress test for slub, and your
> > patch removes code that might hurt netperf, but benefit real workload.
> >
> > Have you tried instead this far less intrusive solution ?
> >
> > if (tail == DEACTIVATE_TO_TAIL ||
> > page->inuse > page->objects / 4)
> > list_add_tail(&page->lru, &n->partial);
> > else
> > list_add(&page->lru, &n->partial);
>
> One could also move this logic to reside outside of the call to
> add_partial(). This is called mostly from __slab_free() so the logic could
> be put in there.
I'm wondering where the improvement comes from. The new added partial
page almost always has few free objects (the inuse < objects/4 isn't
popular I thought), that's why we add it to list tail.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists