linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] slub: set a criteria for slub node partial adding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 05 Dec 2011 11:28:43 +0800
From:	"Alex,Shi" <alex.shi@...el.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	"cl@...ux.com" <cl@...ux.com>,
	"penberg@...nel.org" <penberg@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] slub: set a criteria for slub node partial adding

On Fri, 2011-12-02 at 19:36 +0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le vendredi 02 décembre 2011 à 16:23 +0800, Alex Shi a écrit :
> > From: Alex Shi <alexs@...el.com>
> > 
> > Times performance regression were due to slub add to node partial head
> > or tail. That inspired me to do tunning on the node partial adding, to
> > set a criteria for head or tail position selection when do partial
> > adding.
> > My experiment show, when used objects is less than 1/4 total objects
> > of slub performance will get about 1.5% improvement on netperf loopback
> > testing with 2048 clients, wherever on our 4 or 2 sockets platforms,
> > includes sandbridge or core2.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/slub.c |   18 ++++++++----------
> >  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> netperf (loopback or ethernet) is a known stress test for slub, and your
> patch removes code that might hurt netperf, but benefit real workload.
> 
> Have you tried instead this far less intrusive solution ?
> 
> if (tail == DEACTIVATE_TO_TAIL ||
>     page->inuse > page->objects / 4)
>          list_add_tail(&page->lru, &n->partial);
> else
>          list_add(&page->lru, &n->partial);

For loopback netperf, it has no clear performance change on all
platforms. 
For hackbench testing, it has a bit worse on 2P NHM 0.5~1%, but it is
helpful to increase about 2% on 4P(8cores * 2SMT) NHM machine. 

I was thought no much cache effect on hot or cold after per cpu partial
adding. but seems for hackbench, node partial still has much effect. 


> 
> 
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/