linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dma/ep93xx_dma: fix initialization of M2M control register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 05 Dec 2011 08:18:29 +0530
From:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@....fi>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
	hsweeten@...ionengravers.com, rmallon@...il.com,
	Rafal Prylowski <prylowski@...asoft.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dma/ep93xx_dma: fix initialization of M2M
 control register

On Sat, 2011-11-26 at 12:54 +0200, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> From: Rafal Prylowski <prylowski@...asoft.pl>
> 
> Setting the flags in case of IDE didn't have any effect since the control
> register is overwritten few lines below. So move these to be after the control
> register is initialized.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafal Prylowski <prylowski@...asoft.pl>
> Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@....fi>
> Acked-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>
Applied both, Thanks

I got a trivial merge conflict on both patches as I think these patches
were of made on top of dma_slave_direction changes we did sometime back.

So please do check if merges were right...


-- 
~Vinod

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/