[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111206.003157.159978113328078893.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:31:57 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: sboyd@...eaurora.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: Silence seq_scale() unused warning
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2011 10:29:56 -0800
> On a CONFIG_NET=y build
>
> net/core/secure_seq.c:22: warning: 'seq_scale' defined but not
> used
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>
> I don't know how realistic this configuration is, but here it goes.
Just test INET all by itself, IPV6 will always need the INET
infrastructure for hash tables and inet socket management even in the
extremely unlikely event that we make ipv4 independently selectable at
some point.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists