[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111206053100.GA30784@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:31:00 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/mm] x86/mm: Avoid superflous leave_mm() in the TLB
flush path
* Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 07:26 +0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 9:56 AM, tip-bot for Shaohua Li
> > <shaohua.li@...el.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > x86/mm: Avoid superflous leave_mm() in the TLB flush path
> > >
> > > If just one page VA tlb is required to be flushed and current
> > > task is in lazy TLB state, doing leave_mm() is superfluous
> > > because it flushes the whole TLB. This can reduce some TLB
> > > miss.
> >
> > Are you sure this is a good idea?
> >
> > We may be *much* better off leaving the VM and avoiding future IPI's
> > than trying to flush pages one by one over and over again.
> >
> > IPI's are expensive.
> >
> > I don't think you thought this through, and if you *did* think it
> > through and actually have numbers that it's cheaper to stay with the
> > MM, I think you need to show those numbers.
>
> good point, I didn't think of it. It's unlikely we just flush
> one tlb page. please drop the patch.
Dropped, thanks guys.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists