[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EDF94B0.1050108@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:30:40 +0800
From: "Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)" <paul.liu@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
patches@...aro.org, eric.miao@...aro.org,
Nancy Chen <Nancy.Chen@...escale.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Regulator: Add Anatop regulator driver
(2011年12月07日 23:54), Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 09:53:18PM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:
>> From: "Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)" <paul.liu@...aro.org>
>>
>> Anatop regulator driver is used by i.MX6 SoC. This patch adds the
>> Anatop regulator driver.
>
> This changelog isn't terribly verbose but looking at the code what
> you've actually got here is a driver that is simply an indirection
> layer for the regulator API and no explanation as to why you're doing
> this. My first thought is that anything using this driver should just
> be a regulator driver directly.
Hi Mark,
Thanks. I think you are correct. I just search the LKML and found that
this has been discussed already.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/10/28/325
So what we should do is forget this patch and use fixed regulators
rather than create an indirection layer.
Many Thanks,
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists