linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] linux-next:et131x: Revert changes from previous commit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EDFB712.1000508@xenotime.net>
Date:	Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:57:22 -0800
From:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To:	Mark Einon <mark.einon@...il.com>
CC:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, romieu@...zoreil.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] linux-next:et131x: Revert changes from previous commit

On 12/06/2011 03:23 PM, Mark Einon wrote:
> In commit 834d0ee317b (uintxy_t removal) not all changes were trival text replacements, some converted u64 -> dma_addr_t.
> In some configurations dma_addr_t is a u32, meaning that some bit operations cause build warnings. From Randy Dunlap:
> 
> ----------------
> on i386 (X86_32) builds:
> 
> drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c:2483:8: warning: right shift count >= width of type
> drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c:2531:8: warning: right shift count >= width of type
> ----------------
> 
> Removed these by reverting dma_addr_t back to u64 types, as well as reverting some other non-trivial changes from the aforementioned commit.
> 
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Einon <mark.einon@...il.com>

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>

Thanks.

> ---
>  drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c |   28 +++++++++++++---------------
>  1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c b/drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c
> index 7ae3e53..2c4069f 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/et131x/et131x.c
> @@ -299,8 +299,8 @@ struct fbr_lookup {
>  	dma_addr_t	 ring_physaddr;
>  	void		*mem_virtaddrs[MAX_DESC_PER_RING_RX / FBR_CHUNKS];
>  	dma_addr_t	 mem_physaddrs[MAX_DESC_PER_RING_RX / FBR_CHUNKS];
> -	dma_addr_t	 real_physaddr;
> -	u32		 offset;
> +	u64		 real_physaddr;
> +	u64		 offset;
>  	u32		 local_full;
>  	u32		 num_entries;
>  	u32		 buffsize;
> @@ -1902,10 +1902,9 @@ static void et131x_config_rx_dma_regs(struct et131x_adapter *adapter)
>  	/* Set the address and parameters of Free buffer ring 1 (and 0 if
>  	 * required) into the 1310's registers
>  	 */
> -	writel(((u64) rx_local->fbr[0]->real_physaddr) >> 32,
> +	writel((u32) (rx_local->fbr[0]->real_physaddr >> 32),
>  	       &rx_dma->fbr1_base_hi);
> -	writel(((u64) rx_local->fbr[0]->real_physaddr) & DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
> -	       &rx_dma->fbr1_base_lo);
> +	writel((u32) rx_local->fbr[0]->real_physaddr, &rx_dma->fbr1_base_lo);
>  	writel(rx_local->fbr[0]->num_entries - 1, &rx_dma->fbr1_num_des);
>  	writel(ET_DMA10_WRAP, &rx_dma->fbr1_full_offset);
>  
> @@ -1927,10 +1926,9 @@ static void et131x_config_rx_dma_regs(struct et131x_adapter *adapter)
>  		fbr_entry++;
>  	}
>  
> -	writel(((u64) rx_local->fbr[1]->real_physaddr) >> 32,
> +	writel((u32) (rx_local->fbr[1]->real_physaddr >> 32),
>  	       &rx_dma->fbr0_base_hi);
> -	writel(((u64) rx_local->fbr[1]->real_physaddr) & DMA_BIT_MASK(32),
> -	       &rx_dma->fbr0_base_lo);
> +	writel((u32) rx_local->fbr[1]->real_physaddr, &rx_dma->fbr0_base_lo);
>  	writel(rx_local->fbr[1]->num_entries - 1, &rx_dma->fbr0_num_des);
>  	writel(ET_DMA10_WRAP, &rx_dma->fbr0_full_offset);
>  
> @@ -2275,10 +2273,10 @@ static inline u32 bump_free_buff_ring(u32 *free_buff_ring, u32 limit)
>   * @mask: correct mask
>   */
>  static void et131x_align_allocated_memory(struct et131x_adapter *adapter,
> -					  dma_addr_t *phys_addr, u32 *offset,
> -					  u32 mask)
> +					  u64 *phys_addr, u64 *offset,
> +					  u64 mask)
>  {
> -	dma_addr_t new_addr = *phys_addr & ~mask;
> +	u64 new_addr = *phys_addr & ~mask;
>  
>  	*offset = 0;
>  
> @@ -2430,8 +2428,8 @@ static int et131x_rx_dma_memory_alloc(struct et131x_adapter *adapter)
>  			rx_ring->fbr[1]->offset);
>  #endif
>  	for (i = 0; i < (rx_ring->fbr[0]->num_entries / FBR_CHUNKS); i++) {
> -		dma_addr_t fbr1_tmp_physaddr;
> -		u32 fbr1_offset;
> +		u64 fbr1_tmp_physaddr;
> +		u64 fbr1_offset;
>  		u32 fbr1_align;
>  
>  		/* This code allocates an area of memory big enough for N
> @@ -2496,8 +2494,8 @@ static int et131x_rx_dma_memory_alloc(struct et131x_adapter *adapter)
>  #ifdef USE_FBR0
>  	/* Same for FBR0 (if in use) */
>  	for (i = 0; i < (rx_ring->fbr[1]->num_entries / FBR_CHUNKS); i++) {
> -		dma_addr_t fbr0_tmp_physaddr;
> -		u32 fbr0_offset;
> +		u64 fbr0_tmp_physaddr;
> +		u64 fbr0_offset;
>  
>  		fbr_chunksize =
>  		    ((FBR_CHUNKS + 1) * rx_ring->fbr[1]->buffsize) - 1;


-- 
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/