[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EDFA9D6.5050907@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 10:00:54 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Tim Blechmann <tim@...ngt.org>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [20/80] ALSA: lx6464es - fix device communication via command
bus
On 12/07/2011 09:47 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Ingo, Peter, Thomas? Comments?
>
I agree in principle, although I am really not happy about the idea of
disallowing 64-bit writes from device drivers that haven't explicitly
indicated they won't support it.
However, I would *also* like if more drivers would explicitly specify
the transfer size they expect. Right now, that is done though a set of
functions whose name are a bit of a mismatch to the others:
__iowrite{32,64}_copy(), which probably should be renamed
memcpy_toio{32,64}() and augmented with matching memcpy_fromio{32,64}()
functions.
What do you think?
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists