lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 8 Dec 2011 11:25:33 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.mage@...il.com>
Cc:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] staging: vt6655: card.c, srom.c, vntwifi.c: Code
 cleanup

On Sun, Dec 04, 2011 at 08:01:39PM -0200, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> On Sat, 3 Dec 2011, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 07:58:12PM +0000, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> >>This patch removes commented code, useless comments, blank lines and fix
> >>coding style of the headers of functions.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <marcos.mage@...il.com>
> >>Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
> >>Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
> >>---
> >> /*
> >>- * Description: Test if bits off in eeprom
> >>- *
> >>- * Parameters:
> >>- *  In:
> >>- *      dwIoBase        - I/O base address
> >>- *      byContntOffset  - address of EEPROM
> >>- *      byTestBits      - bits to test
> >>- *  Out:
> >>- *      none
> >>- *
> >>- * Return Value: true if all test bits off; otherwise false
> >>- *
> >>+ * Test if bits off in eeprom
> >>  */
> >
> >Some of these seems sort of useful.  It might be better to change
> >them to doc-book format instead of deleting them:
> >
> >/**
> >* SROMbIsRegBitsOff() - Test if bits off in eeprom
> >* @dwIoBase:       I/O base address
> >* @byContntOffset: Address of EEPROM
> >* @byTestBits:     Bits to test
> >*
> >* Returns true if all test bits off; otherwise false.
> >*/
> >
> >There is a howto in Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt.
> 
> Thanks for the suggestion Dan. I will do it for these 3 patches.
> 
> Greg, please delte this patches, I will sent them again.

Ugh, "which" patches are you referring to?

I see lots here from you, with different back-and-forth from Dan, and I
don't really see an easy way to tell which thread from which, given that
you didn't thread the patches using git-send-email.

So, I've dropped all patches from you from my patch queue, can you
please resend the ones that I am supposed to apply that have been
reviewed by Dan as being acceptable?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ