linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 0/9] Request for inclusion: per-cgroup tcp memory pressure controls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20111212.190734.1967808916779299221.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 12 Dec 2011 19:07:34 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	glommer@...allels.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paul@...lmenage.org,
	lizf@...fujitsu.com, kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com,
	ebiederm@...ssion.com, gthelen@...gle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, kirill@...temov.name, avagin@...allels.com,
	devel@...nvz.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/9] Request for inclusion: per-cgroup tcp memory
 pressure controls

From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 11:47:00 +0400

> This series fixes all the few comments raised in the last round,
> and seem to have acquired consensus from the memcg side.
> 
> Dave, do you think it is acceptable now from the networking PoV?
> In case positive, would you prefer merging this trough your tree,
> or acking this so a cgroup maintainer can do it?

All applied to net-next, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/