linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the final tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:47:01 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the final tree

On 12/14/2011 08:32 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:15 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
>> Maybe caused by commit d5e553d6e0a4 ("trace: Include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
>> in trace_syscalls.c") from the tip tree.  These warnings may have been
>> here for a while as it is hard to catch the new ones among the flood.
>>
> 
> hpa,
> 
> Was this change only needed for x86? If so, could you put that into
> asm/ftrace.h instead?
> 

Yes (on both accounts).  It was part of the syscall changes; I'll move
the include.

	-hpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/