[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111222163304.26be6d0f5e514fefb078c0a6@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:33:04 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the final tree
Hi Peter,
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:47:01 -0800 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>
> On 12/14/2011 08:32 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:15 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> >> Maybe caused by commit d5e553d6e0a4 ("trace: Include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
> >> in trace_syscalls.c") from the tip tree. These warnings may have been
> >> here for a while as it is hard to catch the new ones among the flood.
> >>
> >
> > hpa,
> >
> > Was this change only needed for x86? If so, could you put that into
> > asm/ftrace.h instead?
> >
>
> Yes (on both accounts). It was part of the syscall changes; I'll move
> the include.
Ping?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists