[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120104190613.2e76daaa000ccf61121fdcc1@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 19:06:13 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the final tree
Hi again,
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 16:33:04 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 08:47:01 -0800 "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 12/14/2011 08:32 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2011-12-14 at 18:15 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > >> Maybe caused by commit d5e553d6e0a4 ("trace: Include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
> > >> in trace_syscalls.c") from the tip tree. These warnings may have been
> > >> here for a while as it is hard to catch the new ones among the flood.
> > >>
> > >
> > > hpa,
> > >
> > > Was this change only needed for x86? If so, could you put that into
> > > asm/ftrace.h instead?
> >
> > Yes (on both accounts). It was part of the syscall changes; I'll move
> > the include.
>
> Ping?
Can we please have this fixed ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists