linux-kernel - Re: pull request: wireless 2011-12-15

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111215213822.GB2561@tuxdriver.com>
Date:	Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:38:22 -0500
From:	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
To:	Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Cc:	davem@...emloft.net, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless 2011-12-15

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:04:29PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> 2011/12/15 John W. Linville <linville@...driver.com>:
> > commit 42a3b63bb2ca4996a3d1210a004eae2333f1119e
> >
> > Dave,
> >
> > Here are a few more fixes intended for the 3.2 release.  They are
> > all small and narrowly focused.
> 
> John, I've made a mistake and didn't use [PATCH 3.2] header to make it
> clean my patch is fix. Could you take a look at
> [PATCH] bcma: support for suspend and resume
> please?
> 
> It's not one-liner, but fixes lock ups, which I believe - we really
> want to avoid.

It's late in the release cycle, and Dave specifically asked me to slow down.

Are these suspend/resume lockups a regression?  Or have they always
been there?  Do they happen to everyone?

John
-- 
John W. Linville		Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@...driver.com			might be all we have.  Be ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/