[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20111215135550.748e9aee.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 13:55:50 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] do_truncate needs to increment iversion
On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 18:44:57 +0200
Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com> wrote:
> IMA/EVM uses iversion to identify if file content has been changed.
> It has been found that when file is opened, truncated with ftruncate()
> and then closed, iversion is not updated.
>
> This patch adds iversion incrementation to do_truncate().
I confess that I've never really fully understood what i_version is
supposed to do, so I'm not in any position to comment on where, when
and why the thing should be updated.
At present it gets updated in file_update_time() so I suppose that
we're not calling file_update_time() in the ftruncate case, which
sounds wrong?
It's notable that file_update_time() will not update i_version if the
inode has NOCMTIME. This might be wrong, but one would need to know
the intent of i_version to be able to say. Do your files have
S_NOCMTIME set?
> --- a/fs/open.c
> +++ b/fs/open.c
> @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ int do_truncate(struct dentry *dentry, loff_t length, unsigned int time_attrs,
> newattrs.ia_valid |= ret | ATTR_FORCE;
>
> mutex_lock(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
> + if (IS_I_VERSION(dentry->d_inode))
> + inode_inc_iversion(dentry->d_inode);
> ret = notify_change(dentry, &newattrs);
> mutex_unlock(&dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
> return ret;
With four evaluations, it is time to cache dentry->d_inode in a local.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists