linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] loop: fput() called in loop_clr_fd() may cause bd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 18 Dec 2011 02:47:30 +0300
From:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
	Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] loop: fput() called in loop_clr_fd() may cause bd_mutex
 recursive locking

On (12/17/11 23:38), Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 02:20:53AM +0300, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> 
> > > IOW, we have to prevent such setups anyway and not just because of
> > > problems on close() - they would be deadly on read() and write()...
> > > 
> > 
> > Preventing recursion in the first place? For example, in lo_open()?
> 
> Uh?  No, in loop_set_fd(), where we decide what loop devices will be
> backed by what - the code I quoted to you upthread.
> 

Oops, sorry. Long day at work . Need to sleep.

	Sergey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/